Abstract
To systematically review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compared the
effects of leukocyte-rich and leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma in
arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Two independent reviewers comprehensively
searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases according to the
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
Comparison of leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma or leukocyte-poor
platelet-rich plasma in rotator cuff repair in a level I RCTs. Methodological
quality assessment was carried out using Cochrane Review Manager 5.3 software.
P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Nine RCTs with 540
patients were included in this review. Meta-analysis showed that leukocyte-poor
platelet-rich plasma in significantly reduced retear rate in rotator cuff repair
[RR=0.56 95% CI (0.42, 0.75); P<0.05), and in clinical
results, the constant score [MD=3.67, 95% CI (1.62, 5.73);
P=0.0005], UCLA score [MD=1.60, 95% CI (0.79, 2.42);
P=0.0001], ASES score [MD=2.16, 95% CI (0.12, 4.20);
P=0.04] were significantly improved. There was a significant result in
favor of PRP for the Constant score [MD=−1.24, 95% CI
(−1.50, −0.99); P<0.00001], while SST scores were not
significantly different among all groups [MD=0.21, 95% CI
(−0.21, 0.64); P=0.32]. In conclusion, leukocyte-poor
platelet-rich plasma can improved the clinical function and reduced retear rate
in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. In contrast, the efficacy of leukocyte-rich
platelet-rich plasma was not significantly improved with the exception of VAS
score.
Key words
leukocyte-rich platelet-rich plasma - leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma - rotator
cuff injury - biological augmentation - meta analysis